Dear Charles |
Review by |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fantastic Story Magazine, May 1953 collected in — |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Twists in Time A Logic Named Joe |
July 2006 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Dear Charles" is a surprising little story. Murray Leinster's legendary story-telling smoothness carries us easily into many a strange setting of science fiction or fantasy. In "Dear Charles" we have Leinster setting up a time-travel puzzle: the past influencing the future, not merely through the everyday rumbling along of causality, but through time-travel into the future. This is kind of backwards when you recall the more standard science-fictional situation wherein the future anachronistically influences the past, as in Leinster's phone-call from next week in "Sam, This Is You".
As claimed in the excerpt above, the story is not only mentioned within itself but is a causative factor, a twisty narrative trick not easy to bring off. Additionally, Leinster tells "Dear Charles" in epistolary or letter-form, which is rare; and entirely in the second person — this is what happens or happened to you — which is much rarer and more difficult; and further, it's a future-tense second person narrative — this is what will happen to you — which really is very odd indeed. As you enjoy the story, or more likely after you've finished, do notice what an unusual challenge Leinster set himself in "Dear Charles", how smoothly he handles it, and what fun he clearly has making it happen. Dear reader, you may find yourself having fun thinking about it —
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2006 Robert Wilfred Franson |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|