Fruit of Knowledge |
Review by |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unknown, October 1940
collected in — |
March 2005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The personalities of Paradise Catherine L. Moore is one of the most sensuous writers of science fiction or fantasy. In her 1940 novelet "Fruit of Knowledge", published in Unknown (John W. Campbell's fantasy counterpart to Astounding Science Fiction), she delves into the personalities in the Garden of Eden. Aside from a few cherubs, these personalities are:
The coalescence and conflict of these personalities create the hinge event near the very beginning of Mankind's existence according to the Bible. Looking at the account in Genesis 2-3 gives us a narrow-telescope sensation, as with theoretical physicists analyzing the earliest microseconds of the Universe; too much in too little. Just what kind of entities are these in Eden, anyway, and what are they doing? Lilith is C. L. Moore's main viewpoint character in "Fruit of Knowledge". Lilith is not named in Genesis, perhaps originally a Babylonian storm goddess; in the cabalistic tradition she is Adam's first wife. Since we have so little to go on regarding Lilith — especially in our best-known source, the Bible — modern writers may take a freer hand portraying her without needing to overcome reader resistance. In Moore's account, Lilith is a demiurge second only to the Lord concerning the persons and events in the Garden of Eden. Hers is the first form of Woman, and her wishes power much of the action. The story is thoughtfully and sensuously developed. Moore delineates the above personalities with care and respect, leaving only the flittering cherubs to provide a leavening of humor. If you are curious what the Serpent really looked like as a demigod when he talked with Eve — before he was knocked down to be a venomous snake in the grass — Moore gives you an impressive rendering. The Garden of Eden here is itself alive and aware in a way, semi-divine in its own way as are all the characters. A secular descendant of the Eden of "Fruit of Knowledge" would be James H. Schmitz's "Balanced Ecology". But really it is these dawn characters, living and breathing semi-divine people, who are Catherine Moore's triumph. She stands high in an impressive tradition on the intensely personal nature of what we know and why we know it. Geoffrey Chaucer gives the temptation in the Garden to his most respected character, the Parson, to tell of:
You shall not die; your eyes shall open and you shall be as gods, knowing good and harm. Or as our primary source here says in another context,
Catherine Moore writes beautifully in a short space on the Perfectibility of Man, of promise offered and lost, in the persons of Lilith, Eve, Adam, and Lucifer. She makes it a vivid and personal story, not argued theory although thoughtful, but felt and lived. Yet of course the ramifications are vast, far beyond the boundaries of the personal hopes and tragedies of Genesis 2-3 or of "Fruit of Knowledge". The great philosopher of the Scientific Revolution challenges us, in the very first line of his first Essay: Many are the trees of God that grow in Paradise The Biblical apple of knowledge that Eve and Adam eat bears a family relationship to the Classical golden apple of discord used in the Judgment of Paris which led to the Trojan War. Does knowledge lead to discord and isolation and spiritual-physical stunting? Or does it encourage concord and community and spiritual-physical development and fulfillment? "Fruit of Knowledge" helps us sense that this remains a living and most vital question. At the 17th Century dawn of the Scientific Revolution, John Milton's great epic Paradise Lost gives Eve a rather modern view. As Milton imagines the scene leading to the hinge event in Eden, Eve says to Lucifer:
An expansive and forward vision.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2005 Robert Wilfred Franson |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|